Category: Film Page 1 of 101

2023: The Year That Was

As usual, I’ve failed at getting back into posting regularly, and as usual, I’m making another resolution to do better. But in the meantime, let’s take a look back at 2023.

It’s been a great year for me personally, even if my writing time has not reflected that! I’ve started my third year of teaching 11th/12th grade literature at a Classical Christian School, and it’s going better than ever. I’d heard the third year is when you really start to feel comfortable teaching, and I’ll back that up. Of course, I still have so many notes I’m making on what to tweak for next year! I don’t think that will ever stop.

My kids are now ages 10 and 5, which are some really fun ages. Older is in 5th grade at the school where I teach, and she loves it – except when they take forEVER to read a book in literature! So far they’ve read Tom Sawyer and The Family Under the Bridge this year and I’d read both of them to her before, oops. But I also don’t regret it – the joy of sharing Tom Sawyer especially with her was something I couldn’t resist. The little one is in Kindergarten, just starting to sound out her first words. This stage is so exciting! She’s also a totally different personality when it comes to school than my older was, so that’s been interesting to figure out.

In reading, I managed to finish 54 books, including rereads and read alouds, of which there were many. My older daughter and I have been enjoying story-based history and legends – we’ve done Norse mythology, English history (best history story book I’ve found: Our Island Story, it’s seriously so good), King Arthur, and now we’re on American history and the Arabian Nights. I’m largely following Ambleside Online booklists for our read alouds, though I did slip in A Wrinkle in Time earlier this year! See below for my fave reads of the year.

This was the year I almost gave up movies and social media entirely, which kind of makes me wonder who I even am anymore. But I’m okay being a teacher/reader for now, anyway. What movies I did watch were mostly in the first half of the year and largely followed the whim of the Criterion Channel‘s featured programming. I watched a lot of really fun stuff this way that I might not otherwise have sought out, so I was really happy with this plan. The other main moviewatching I did was introducing older daughter to a lot of movies – she’s becoming a big fan of classic movie musicals, which gives me great glee. She’s even favorably disposed to black and white movies on principle, and it’s so fun to find out what an old soul she already is. We’ve also had the opportunity to go to two of my favorite stage musicals at the downtown Ahmanson Theatre – The Secret Garden and Into the Woods, both of which she loved as well!

I have been extremely sporadic on social media – I haven’t posted at all on Facebook this year, though I have succumbed to checking in on a few individuals and groups. I don’t think I’ll delete it, but I was very happy not being active on it, so don’t expect me to return in force. I similarly dipped in and out of Twitter (or X, whatever); I still follow a lot of people I like reading there, but the general vibe of the place is so negative and complainy that I can’t stay there for long. I’ve dabbled in Microblog, which I like overall but don’t know anyone else personally who uses it, so it feels like starting a whole new community – too daunting right now. My happy place is the Patreon-gated Literary Life Discord, and I will say that if you’re into old books and not listening to The Literary Life Podcast, you’re doing it wrong. I am considering starting a Substack, though what I’d do there that I’m already not doing here, I’m not sure? But all my favorite online READING is currently happening on Substack, so I’m feeling drawn there. And maybe the easy email option would be nice for readers now that RSS is all but faded from use for most people.

Enough jabbering. To the lists!

Books

Things that guided my reading this year were mostly school (both rereading books I teach and reading books on education/philosophy/literature that inform my teaching), the Literary Life reading challenge (check out the 2024 edition here), and the 12 Books in 12 Months challenge I gathered recommendations for one of my last posts on Facebook in Dec 2022. Plus a few personal goals like wanting to read Anna Karenina finally, which I did! Here are a few highlights. Note that I could highlight everything – I didn’t read a single thing I didn’t like this year!

David Copperfield by Charles Dickens

As if Anna Karenina were not enough, I also set myself the task of reading this Dickens behemoth. Aha, said I, but I will do it via audiobook! Somehow that time-saving device does not work for me and even though I started early in the year I had only made it through half the book by October when I gave up on audio and gobbled up the rest via print. (I do HIGHLY recommend the Richard Armitage audio; I’m just not an audiobook person.) This one my mom and I started when I was a teenager and we both got bored and stopped. I’m so glad to return to it years later – there are still sloggy parts, but it all ties up so beautifully and heartbreakingly and heartwarmingly that I’m kicking myself for not reading it earlier.

East of Eden by John Steinbeck

I feel like this was the year of me finally getting to a lot of books I’d put off because I didn’t feel like I’d like them, and being TOTALLY WRONG. I inhaled this book (which isn’t short!) in a week over spring break and instantly placed it among my all-time favorites. It’s evocative and sprawling and mythopeoic. I loved it so much I’m considering doing it in class some year instead of Brothers Karamazov (and I LOVE Brothers Karamazov).

Another book I read almost at the same time and felt paired really well was Wallace Stegner’s Angle of Repose. Like parts of East of Eden, it’s set in California (and environs) in the early settler period, about a young woman from the East who marries a mining engineer – a surprise to many because she is cultured and artistic and he is taciturn and very rough around the edges. It’s a hard, beautiful, and poetic book.

Anna Karenina by Leo Tolstoy

I’ve always felt this book was probably not for me. Adultery and all that, plus I already knew the ending! Then I watched the 2012 Joe Wright film and LOVED it. Then I had babies and reading a 900 page Russian novel felt pretty daunting. But 2023 was the year, I planned it as soon as summer started, and wow, was this a showstopper. It’s sprawling and intimate and complicated and beautiful. It has me ready to read War and Peace next summer, is that overly ambitious?

Love What Lasts: How to Save Your Soul from Mediocrity by Joshua Gibbs

I’m going to use this space to mention several similar books, but I honestly think I got the most out of this one. Gibbs argues that we should avoid what he calls “mediocre” (things that are ephemeral by nature and not intended to last) and focus instead on “common” (ordinary goods) and “uncommon” (great/holy things). The main point is about taste – that taste matters, and a steady diet of the mediocre will prevent us from developing good taste, and that this affects our soul (not in terms of salvation but in terms of living the good life). I find his argument compelling but also challenging and controversial at times, which I love in a book like this.

In similar books, I read The Wisdom Pyramid by Brett McCracken as our assigned teacher development book for school, and I spent the whole thing going “yes, I agree, but Gibbs is better”. McCracken’s point is similar, that to seek wisdom, we need to plan our “diet” carefully to prioritize things that give wisdom – scripture, church community, nature, great books, beauty all above social media/internet. Like, he’s right, but it’s pretty surface-level and not really the good struggle like I had with Gibbs’ book.

Other things I read and recommend in the broad education/cultural criticism/philosophy category: Range: Why Generalists Triumph in a Specialist World by David Epstein (I’ve never felt better about being a generalist), Reading for the Love of God by Jessica Hooten Wilson (really good and deep exploration of reading as a spiritual practice, and how to use spiritual disciplines to read better), Amusing Ourselves to Death by Neil Postman and Total Truth by Nancy Pearcey (honestly, a tragedy I hadn’t read these before), and both Consider This and Know and Tell by Karen Glass (an argument for Charlotte Mason being in the Classical tradition, and a nitty-gritty book on narration which I’m using every day in class).

A World Undone: The Story of the Great War 1914-1918 by G.J. Meyer

This was the recommendation from my history teacher friend when I asked him what I should read over the summer. He knows I’m pretty into World War I, and this is one of the few books he says deals with the WHOLE war. It was great – covered the lead-up, the battles, the aftermath, as well as the historical backgrounds of various groups that informs the conflict.

The Accursed by Joyce Carol Oates

For some reason I had Joyce Carol Oates in a category with prolific “literary” but shallow bestsellers, and I think I was wrong. This was recommended to me in the 12 in 12 Months challenge and I was like, really? But then I looked it up and was like, oh, a gothic novel set in 1910s Princeton? Okay, we’ll give it a try. It is a RIDE, let me tell you. Woodrow Wilson and Upton Sinclair are major characters, there are demons and vampires, and a whole sojourn into a hellish dimension. And all of this in dispassionate prose meant to be by a young historian telling the real story behind an outbreak of hysteria in Princeton. Somehow this “historical” approach makes what happens even more horrifying.

I realized about the time I read The Accursed that I really do need some more modern fiction, especially speculative fiction, mixed in with classics, so I picked up a few more to finish off the year. Six Wakes by Mur Lafferty was actually another 12 in 12 pick, and I basically couldn’t stop reading it once I started (except the three days of agony when I left it at church). Premise is cloning is common, and the six-person crew of a spaceship trying to safely find a new planet for their generation ship all wake up in new cloned bodies and find their previous clones had been murdered…but by whom? This is exactly the kind of hook I can’t resist, and it plays out very satisfyingly. I chose The Starless Sea by Erin Morgenstern on my own due to enjoying her The Night Circus and being in love with stories about libraries and stories. I do think this one went off the rails a bit at the end (she’s more modern than traditional in her treatment of story and I don’t love that), but overall, I was captivated. Finally, I grabbed a classic I’ve been meaning to read for a while: The Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. LeGuin. It was pretty fantastic, though I did find the ending a bit tropey. Throughout there was so much to love, and I’m told I really need to read on in the series, so hopefully that will be a 2024 thing.

The Code of the Woosters by P.G. Wodehouse

I always try to get in a few Wodehouse novels every year, and this was the only one that made it in this year, but it was a doozy of a good one! The hilarity kicks off when Bertie has to be the unfortunate go-between in the acquisition of a coveted cow creamer desired by two relatives, both of whom Bertie greatly wants to stay on the good side of. This leads to elaborate schemes which only the genius of Jeeves can untangle.

Beautiful Stories from Shakespeare for Children by E. Nesbit

I don’t love children’s versions of novels, but I make exceptions for legends and stories like this – most of these stories existed in some form before Shakespeare and it’s actually really helpful to be familiar with the story before reading the full play version. I read this to my 10yo and we LOVED it. For me, it really made clear how so many Shakespeare storeis are structured like fairy tales and need to be understood as such – a harder thing to realize when reading the plays because so much focus goes on the language (not incorrectly!).

Other great read-alouds (most of which I had read before): King Arthur and His Knights of the Round Table by Roger Lancelyn Green, Our Island Story by H.E. Marshall, Little Women by Louisa May Alcott, The Good Master by Kate Seredy, A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle, The Princess and the Goblin by George MacDonald and d’Aulaire’s Norse Myths.

Demon Copperhead by Barbara Kingsolver

I just finished this one yesterday, and I admit I don’t yet feel ready to say a lot about it (though I do have a lot of unorganized notes about it!). In a way, I read David Copperfield because of this book; a friend recommended it for the 12 in 12 challenge, and I had been intrigued by it already, but I didn’t want to read it without having read David Copperfield. Due to how long it took me to finish Copperfield, I ended up reading this IMMEDIATELY after it, and I’m not sure if that was a great idea or a terrible one. It was a great one in the sense that I could see very clearly all the references and allusions Kingsolver is making to it, many of which I might have missed had I not read the Dickens so very recently. On the other hand, with how much I loved Copperfield, Copperhead had a lot to live up to, and it’s probably not fair to put it in such close proximity with what is only its inspiration, to be fair. Kingsolver is not trying to write the same story, and she does not. She makes changes that are very fitting for her modern Appalachian setting, and a lot of it works very well. I slammed through this very long book, too, easily reading 60-70 pages at a time, fully engrossed. That said, Kingsolver seems to understand Dickens’ story as his “experience as a survivor of institutional poverty and its damages to children in his society” (a quote from the flyleaf which is born out in her treatment of Demon and the story in general) which is extremely reductive of Dickens’ story, which is about so much more than that. Many of the characters are interesting in their own right, but are mere shadows of Dickens’ creations. The sense of place is MUCH stronger here, which I think is a strength in some ways, but also ties her story down to social criticism in a way that Dickens is not, despite her reductive understanding of him – Dickens is interested in transcendent truth.

Okay, I guess I did have a lot to say about it. LOL. I appreciated reading it. There’s a lot here. I just also found it frustrating.

Film

As I said, most of my film-viewing this year was of the Criterion programming or watching with my family variety, though I did slip a few others in there.

Criterion viewing

I wrote about a few of these early in the year, so I won’t belabor them. From the Joan Bennet series in January, the most memorable two were Me and My Gal and Man Hunt, with an honorable mention for the craziness of Wild Girl. From the Pre-Code Paramount series in February, Merrily We Go to Hell is the clear standout. I also watched almost the entirety of the Michelle Yeoh series in March, but I didn’t end up getting a post up about it. The Heroic Trio series was ridiculous but super fun, and Police Story 3 was a major standout. A few other Criterion notables were Robert Siodmak’s stylish The Phantom Lady (maybe my fave new-to-me film all year), The River of No Return (Monroe + Mitchum, how had I not seen this?), Jacques Tourneur’s Experiment Perilous, and Backfire from the recent Christmas Noir series.

Les Vampires (1916)

My one attempt early in the year to revive my old chrono project; and this is pretty great. A great example of silent storytelling, consistently mysterious and engaging (though some episodes are more so than others), and so clearly influential on later films. Does crime cinema start here?

RRR (2022)

This movie is off the chain in all the best ways possible. I love Indian cinema in general and haven’t watched enough of it lately. This was a great one to get back into it. Not AS MUCH music as it could have had, honestly, but it makes up for that in some of the most insane fight/action scenes I have ever seen in any movie.

Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse (2023)

The one and only time I made it to the theatre this whole year – and get this, it was my first time in the theatre since December 2019. A far cry from the old days, where I saw at least a movie a week in theaters no matter what! Ah, well. If I missed it more I would make more of an effort, so I guess I’m okay. Anyway. This was great, like the first one, and I will see the third in theatres as well.

Alfred Hitchcock on Criterion

After several months of NO movies except the occasional famiyly rewatch, I used Christmas break to get back into Criterion festivals a bit. I watched a couple from the Christmas noir series (see above) but mostly focused on the Hitchcock for the Holidays series, because it included several of his early British films that I have missed. (I’ve seen every post-1934 Hitchcock feature except The Paradine Case.) I crossed off Downhill, The Lodger, Murder!, and The Skin Game. The first was pretty routine, but the others are quite good, with Murder! the clear standout – mystery, courtroom drama, and backstage story all rolled into one!

The Kid Who Would Be King (2019)

I had intended to watch this when it came out due to Joe Cornish and King Arthur, but missed it then. Came up as a possibility for a friends’ movie night pre-New Year’s Eve, and we jumped at the opportunity, especially since 10yo and I have spent so much time on King Arthur this year. It was a lot of fun! It brought elements of the legends in quite nicely and had a good Attack the Block-ish vibe. A bit earnest at times, but I find that pretty easily forgivable.

Family Watches

It may not have been a plentiful year for new-to-me watches, but it was a pretty fantastic year for family watches. The kids are finally getting old enough to enjoy a lot more in the way of movies, classics and otherwise. Among others, this year we watched the Back to the Future trilogy, Karate Kid and Karate Kid II, Superman, Superman II, and Superman Returns, the Lord of the Rings trilogy (a new Thanksgiving break tradition!), Galaxy Quest, Porco Rosso, The Mask of Zorro, National Velvet, Arsenic and Old Lace, Charade, It’s a Wonderful Life, Camelot, and to cap things off, a late night viewing of Jurassic Park as we let 10yo stay up late for New Year’s Eve.

Video Games

I didn’t have a lot of time for video games this year, but I did play Starfield extensively. Meanwhile, my husband has been playing Baldur’s Gate 3 incessantly since it came out, so we’ve had ample opportunity to discuss these two very different RPGs (he’s played some Starfield also and since BG3 came out on Xbox we’ve been playing co-op). I have loved Bethesda games since Elder Scrolls: Oblivion and my very first console, and I have not really gotten tired of their schtick, so I’ve enjoyed Starfield a ton, and have gotten to new game plus and am working my way back through all the faction quests a second time. I really like the additional Bioware-inspired romances (I didn’t play the Fallout that had romances), I’ve always liked Bethesda-style missions and dialogue, and the combat style works really well for me. THAT SAID, I also really love BG3‘s very different approach to character interactions. My husband has pointed out that Bethesda games think the player character is the greatest in the universe and BG3 couldn’t care less, really, so the dialogue is a lot punchier and funnier. I think BG3 is probably the future of RPGs but I have no shame about continuing to enjoy Bethesda’s more old-fashioned style.

Adventures on Criterion: Pre-Code Paramount

March’s featured collections on the Criterion Channel were a treasure trove for me! I was quite interested in almost all of them, but I had to focus on just a couple. First up had to be the Paramount Pre-Codes. I’m generally a pretty big fan of Pre-Code Hollywood, and unsurprisingly I had seen about half of this collection already.

If you’re new to Pre-Codes, I can’t recommend Trouble in Paradise, Love Me Tonight, and Shanghai Express enough. Those three should definitely be top priority if you haven’t seen them (they should be on the channel through at least the end of April – I forget whether they keep collections on for two or three months). I also really enjoy the other three I had seen: The Smiling Lieutenant, She Done Him Wrong, Design for Living, and One Hour With You.

This left largely obscurities for me to see, though some big names are attached to those obscurities – like a very early Cary Grant film, a couple of Dorothy Arzner-directed films (the only female director working in Hollywood in the 1930s), and an omnibus film with sections directed by Ernst Lubitsch among others. As of April 1, there are still a couple of films I haven’t gotten to – the 1934 Cecil B. DeMille version of Cleopatra, and the Ernst Lubitsch-directed drama Broken Lullaby. The former should be fairly easy to find and watch, and I have less interest in Lubitsch directing drama, though I should watch it for completionism’s sake. Maybe sometime this month.

Night After Night (1932)

A nightclub story, with the gangster activity and love affairs you might expect from that. Raft’s character has a girl, but becomes enamored of a glamorous woman who comes in alone frequently – turns out his club is built in the mansion she grew up in, and she’s sentimental. She’s clearly of a higher social caliber than he is (he is taking lessons in etiquette and general knowledge to move up the social ladder) and he falls hard for her. Meanwhile, a former lover turns up – Mae West in her film debut. She steals the show, but the rest isn’t bad either. However, it’s not going to make you a fan of this type of movie if you’re not already. It has some amount of early sound clunkiness.

Merrily We Go to Hell (1932)

One of the two Dorothy Arzner-directed films in the featured collection, Merrily We Go to Hell focuses on a star-crossed couple – Jerry (Fredric March), a reporter and would-be playwright, and Joan (Sylvia Sidney), an heiress who falls for him against her family’s wishes. Their relationship is rocky to say the least – she stands by him in good times, as when his play gets produced, and less-good ones, as when he missed their engagement party because he freaked out and got drunk. Until, that is, Jerry falls into seeing his old girlfriend, now a famous actress, and Joan decides to have a fully “modern marriage” – that is, basically an open, swinging marriage where each of them can do whatever they want on the side. (Look for a young Cary Grant here as one of her “on the sides”.) There’s a very thoughtful and mature tone throughout all these shenanigans, which could easily have just been played for laughs or crudity. I was impressed with how well this story was handled. Props to Arzner, for sure.

Honor Among Lovers (1931)

This is the other Arzner film, with Claudette Colbert as the greatest ever executive assistant plus a super great person in general, so it’s not super surprising that her boss Fredric March falls in love with her. She’s not keen on a potential office romance, though, so she quickly marries her existing boyfriend, an up-and-coming stockbroker. They’re pretty happy for a while, but stockbroker boy is speculating pretty heavily with other people’s money and things go downhill from there. There are a lot of interesting and unusual plot moves made here, and while I didn’t love all of them (having the initially lascivious March become the “good guy” was a bit hard to swallow), it was an enjoyable ride, and Colbert is never less than luminous. Also look for a really young Ginger Rogers as a complete ditz. Sort of an unfortunate part, but there you go.

If I Had a Million (1932)

A dying millionaire is fed up with all of his money-grubbing potential heirs and decides to give a million dollars each to eight strangers chosen at random from the telephone book. We then see eight vignettes (each directed by a different director – Ernst Lubitsch, Norman Taurog, Norman Z. McLeod, etc) that show what each of the recipients did with the money. As usual with these kinds of omnibus films, the stories range from the heartwarming to the sad to the ridiculous. None of these are particularly great as omnibus segments go, but none of them wear out their welcome too much, either.

Adventures on Criterion: Joan Bennett

January’s “star of the month” on Criterion is Joan Bennett, and I’ve spent the month catching up with all the films in the collection I hadn’t already seen, which was a substantial chunk! I like Bennett, but somehow even though I KNOW it, I always manage to forget that the blonde vixen of the Pre-Codes is the same person as the brunette femme fatale of the noirs (not to mention the motherly figure of Father of the Bride)! Bennett had range, and this collection covers it nicely. To be utterly fair, my first exposure to Bennett was her role as Amy in the 1933 version of Little Women, which doesn’t fit neatly into any of the previously mentioned categories!

I didn’t rewatch the two Fritz Lang noir films, The Woman in the Window and Scarlet Street, but I recommend both – I specifically think Scarlet Street is one of the best noir films ever made, and while true noir fans know this, it doesn’t seem to ever crack the echelon of best-known noir films (Double Indemnity, Out of the Past, etc), which is unjust. This month’s viewing for me was largely Pre-Code plus the few later films I had missed. I watched my last unseen this morning, which may be the first time I have fully completed a Criterion Channel collection!

Big Brown Eyes (1936)

I love being able to check off films from other major filmographies while watching these star-focused Criterion collections, and this was a Cary Grant film I didn’t even know about! This is a breezy mystery comedy with Grant as a detective trying to bust up a jewel thief gang, with intermittent help from Joan Bennett, who starts off as a manicurist, then briefly becomes a journalist, and then gets drummed out and goes back to being a manicurist. It’s a roller-coaster. Also a roller-coaster: her feelings for Grant, which careen wildly from love to jealousy to disregard and back to love. It’s a little too much, to be honest, and her character isn’t very believable, though Bennett does what she can with what the script forces her into. That said, the film is fun, and the jewel thief subplot gives a duplicitous Walter Pidgeon some fun.

Me and My Gal (1932)

I had heard of this before, although mostly in context of not getting it confused with the Gene Kelly-Judy Garland For Me and My Gal. This one has Spencer Tracy as a policeman in a wharf district cleaning up the place and chatting up diner waitress Joan Bennett. The script is better than Big Brown Eyes, though there are still some relationship back and forths that don’t make total sense. That said, the scene where he tries to make the moves on her and she refuses is more subtle than it seems. The main story plot actually involves Bennett’s sister, who used to be romantically involved with a gangster – she’s now getting married to someone else, but when the gangster turns back up, she falls back into her old ways, even harboring him when he’s on the run. Given Bennett’s blossoming relationship with cop Tracy, this is problematic. There are a ton of really cool little things here – especially the plot point of the sister’s father-in-law, a veteran with lock-in syndrome. I’ve never seen this condition in an old movie and it’s used quite well. There’s also a hilarious scene involving fish-slapping, which is totally random but I loved it.

Wild Girl (1932)

I rather expected this to be the wild card of the bunch, and I was not wrong. You know you’re in for something when there’s one of those opening credit sequences where the actors introduce themselves as the characters and Joan Bennett says “I’m Salomy Jane, and I like trees better than men – they’re straight!” The film was shot on location in Sequoia National Park, which is really awesome – almost all of it takes place outdoors among the redwoods. Salomy Jane is hounded by the man who’s trying to become mayor and touts his founding of some kind of Virtue League or something, but he’s anything but virtuous when trying to get Salomy Jane’s attention (she means “on the level” when she says “straight” in that intro). She can’t get anyone to believe her, though. Meanwhile, a stranger in town knows about the mayoral candidate’s bad actions (he had also seduced the stranger’s sister), and is there to kill him. This endears him immediately to Salomy Jane. MEANWHILE, a lazy neighbor with a brood of children robs the stagecoach and everyone sets out after him. It’s all incredibly melodramatic, and yet somehow quite watchable if you let it be what it is. A talent Raoul Walsh seems to have, as you notice he directed all three of the 1930s Bennett films.

Man Hunt (1941)

With this one we move from Raoul Walsh directing to Fritz Lang directing, and as much as I do genuinely love Raoul Walsh films…yeah. Lang is in another league. This one immediately makes a stylistic impact with the camera following a man’s footsteps going to the edge of a cliff, only then revealing Walter Pidgeon with a sniper rifle. He soon has Hitler in his sights. He pulls the trigger but the gun isn’t loaded. He then puts in a bullet but gets collared by a Nazi officer (George Sanders!) and has to explain how he’s a big game hunter and just into the thrill of the hunt and wouldn’t have pulled the trigger etc etc etc. The officer understandably does not believe him, but he escapes and sets off the titular manhunt across Europe and Britain. It’s a fairly small movie despite the premise, and I’m not sure I ENTIRELY bought Bennett’s Cockney accent, but the film is very solid and very stylish, as you’d expect from Lang.

There’s Always Tomorrow (1955)

Definitely the odd one out of this series in terms of Bennett roles; here she’s the wife and mother in a typical suburban family, as her husband toys with a dalliance. Fred MacMurray is the husband, who keeps planning outings and events and having his wife too caught up in the duties of motherhood/homemaking to do them. She encourages him to go alone on what was meant to be a couples getaway for them, and he does but lo and behold meets a former flame. I’m not particularly into domestic melodramas, but I will admit that Douglas Sirk is a master of them. This one is solid if nothing particularly special. I mostly just wanted to keep yelling at MacMurray’s character that you need to check in with your family before you plan stuff, this is like marriage and family 101. Don’t get mad they made other plans when you didn’t even tell them your plans until five minutes before they were happening.

Adventures on Criterion: Snow Westerns and The Secret of Convict Lake

The other December series on Criterion Channel that interested me (besides Screwball Comedies) was Snow Westerns, which predictably features westerns set at wintertime and/or high in the mountains with lots of snow. It’s a neat and unexpected feature to structure programming around, and I am here for it. McCabe and Mrs. Miller (1971) was my first thought when seeing the topic, and sure enough, that one’s here and a must-see. Another personal favorite in this series is Ride the High Country (1962), which deals with one of my favorite sub-genres of westerns (not snow, though there’s that as well) – the aging cowboy and the passing of the old West as civilization takes over. The Far Country (1955) is one of the best of the James Stewart-Anthony Mann collaborations, and they’re all good. Beyond those, there are a lot of new-to-me films to catch up with here, though I may stop short of watching Ravenous (1999), described as a “cannibal comedy”.

I started with the earliest film on the list, which is a typical move for me as I go through these series – I will read all the plot descriptions to choose based on interest, but frequently they all sound interesting and I just default to chronological order. That put 1951’s The Secret of Convict Lake first up. I had never heard of this, but a western with Glenn Ford and Gene Tierney interested me immediately. Ford is an escaped convict who managed to get across the Sierra Nevadas from Carson City along with five other convicts – he leads them to a small settlement on Lake Monte Diablo; they think he’s leading them there because he has stashed $40,000 from a robbery there. In fact, he was framed for the robbery and he’s going to kill the man who framed him. But when they get there, the men have all gone silver prospecting and the settlement is 100% women, another plot detail that interested me greatly (women alone in the west fascinates me as a plot point; see Westward the Women).

Additional plot twist: lovely Gene Tierney is the fiancee of the man who framed Ford. Now, you may ask, as I did, how are the top-billed big star actor and actress going to become each other’s love interests, as you assume they will, if she’s in love with the man he’s sworn to kill? The writers work it out, trust me. The film is intense in a lot of different ways, as there are lots of dangers here. Also, there’s a great late role for the iconic Ethel Barrymore as the matriarch of the settlement. She may be bedridden for most of the film, but she has a force of character that towers over everything. She’s frail-bodied, but she is definitely iron-willed.

The voiceover at the end of the film claims it’s a true story, and that Lake Monte Diablo was renamed Convict Lake due to this incident. Of course I had to look that up immediately. There is a grain of truth in it – there is a Convict Lake in California (near Mammoth) and it was named that due to a posse catching up with a bunch (like 30) escaped Carson City convicts near that lake, in a creek named Monte Diablo. The female-only settlement, the robbery frame-up, the love story – no sign of any of that in history. I’ll go on the record saying I’m glad the film added those elements. Historical verisimilitude is overrated in many cases.

Adventures on Criterion: Screwballs

Trying to make full use of my Criterion Channel subscription (the best streaming option out there if you like classic and arthouse films), I’ve been spending most of my moviewatching time lately letting Criterion be my guide. Usually they add two or three new programming blocks each month with different focuses – this month they’re Screwball Comedies, Snow Westerns, and Sight & Sound’s Greatest Films. Those features are available for a couple of months and then they cycle off. It’s great for catching up on lesser-known films or picking up some blind spots.

At a different stage of my life I might be devouring the Sight & Sound collection, but I find that right now, all I really want are Hollywood classics – reverting to my childhood upbringing? Perhaps. Anyway. This means I’ve been bingeing the few remaining Screwball classics I hadn’t already seen (and to be honest I may rewatch some old favorites before the month is out!) and I also plan to check out several of the Snow Westerns. I figured I’d post about what I’ve been watching.

This is an almost ridiculously great set of movies here, filled out with some absolute obscurities, which is the best kind of programming the Criterion Channel does. Fill in must-see gaps, rewatch old favorites, and check out something I’ve never heard of? Sign me up.

If you’re new to the world of screwball comedies, just know this – they are madcap comedies usually featuring a battle of the sexes, with some of the wittiest dialogue, zaniest plots, and most interesting characters (especially women characters) in the classic era. There are some absolute must-sees in this programming, like It Happened One Night (1934), The Awful Truth (1937), His Girl Friday (1940), The Lady Eve (1941), Ball of Fire (1941), Sullivan’s Travels (1941), and To Be or Not to Be (1943). Second tier perhaps but still great if you love screwballs: Twentieth Century (1934), Theodora Goes Wild (1936), Easy Living (1937), Holiday (1938), Midnight (1939), The Palm Beach Story (1942), The More the Merrier (1943), Miracle of Morgan’s Creek (1944), and Hail the Conquering Hero (1944). Of course fans will argue with my placement there, and I might argue with myself.

But for me, I’m going for the obscurities – so the past couple of weeks I’ve already watched three that I hadn’t even heard of before now, and I enjoyed all three!

Love is News (1937)

In this Tay Garnett-directed comedy, Tyrone Power is a hotshot reporter whose failing paper was just taken over by his former friend current antagonist Don Ameche – they have an ongoing love-hate relationship throughout the film. The screwball comes in when Ty attempts to nail the story of an heiress ditching her titled fiancĂ©. The heiress (played by Loretta Young) is tired of newspapermen hounding her, and especially tired of Ty personally, as he’s misrepresented her before in published interviews. She takes the unlikely step of telling all the OTHER newspapermen that she’s engaged to Ty, which puts him in the limelight and gives him a taste of his own medicine. This leads to lots of sparring and also obviously them falling in love for real. Some fun people show up in supporting roles, notably a disgruntled George Sanders as the dumped fiancĂ©, who is kind of a heel. There are elements of Libeled Lady (1936), His Girl Friday (1940), and It Happened One Night (1934) in here – it’s not as good as any of those, but it’s plenty of fun.

Murder, He Says (1945)

So it’s kind of like Arsenic and Old Lace (1944) crossed with The Cat and the Canary (1929) except instead of kindly old Aunts in Brooklyn, it’s ornery hillbillies in the Ozarks. Fred MacMurray is the hapless guy here, a pollster looking for a colleague who disappeared a few weeks back, only to find himself stuck in the backwoods with a family who’ll do anything they can to get their hands on the fortune stolen and hidden by cousin Bonnie, currently away in state prison. The family becomes convinced MacMurray is Bonnie’s boyfriend, which becomes more convoluted when Bonnie shows up, except it ain’t Bonnie, it’s a sweet young girl who needs to find the money to exonerate her father, an innocent implicated in the robbery. Yes, the plot is complicated, and it’s a pretty black comedy at times, but it ultimately does build in hilarity as the real Bonnie turns up and everything escalates beyond belief. Honestly, I had such a great time with this, I have no idea why I’d never heard of it before. Deserves more of an audience!

You Never Can Tell (1951)

Okay, as soon as I read Criterion’s plot description of this thing I knew I had to watch it. Here’s the short version. A millionaire leaves his fortune to his dog King when he dies, an odd but not particularly unheard of occurrence. But then King is poisoned. And then he goes to Beastatory – like Purgatory for animals. King requests to return to earth to solve his murder, and the leader of Beastatory (a lion, of course), agrees that he can return for three days as a human private detective (played by Dick Powell!) to give it a try. Actually, sorry, he’s a “humanimal.” He’s accompanied by a horse who returns as one of those pert private eye secretary types but she wears a hat with horse ears, carries a purse shaped like a feedbag, and can outrun buses. The detective, Rex Shepherd (King is a German Shepherd) also snacks on kibble. It’s seriously bizarre. Beastatory is depicted in the weirdest golden bass relief visuals; it’s seriously kind of terrifying. I have no idea who this movie is FOR. It’s silly enough to be for kids, but also too bizarre and sometimes scary. That said, I…quite enjoyed it. So apparently it’s a movie for me. People who like bizarre and ridiculous things. So yeah.

Page 1 of 101

Powered by WordPress & Theme by Anders Norén